A lighter role-based command surface backed by a typed backend API for asset reliability, operations control, ESG performance, asset drill-downs, and work-order flow.
System Time
06 May 2026, 23:39:49
Active console:Reliability Engineer/ Engineer console
Each card explains the source, ingestion path, refresh cadence, data-quality status, and governance owner for a dashboard metric. This makes prototype values easier to audit before live MCM systems are connected.
Metric provenance
Asset Health Index
Validated
SourceCMMS asset register + OT historian health signals
RefreshEvery 60 seconds in prototype telemetry loop
Completeness92%
OwnerReliability Engineering
Ingestion: Backend aggregation of simulated historian readings, asset master records, and maintenance status snapshots
Governance: Fleet average is calculated server-side from individual asset health scores so all role views use the same value.
Validated 06 May 2026, 10:45:00
Metric provenance
Failure Risk Assets
Monitoring
SourcePredictive-risk rules engine + maintenance interval data
RefreshEvery 60 seconds; recalibrated after telemetry refresh
Completeness88%
OwnerMaintenance Planning
Ingestion: Risk scores above threshold are counted from the backend asset-risk collection
Governance: Counts include assets at or above 70% risk or assets marked critical, matching the explainability threshold shown in the portal.
Validated 06 May 2026, 11:10:00
Metric provenance
Active Alerts
Validated
SourceAlert event queue and operator acknowledgements
RefreshLive queue refresh on user action; simulated telemetry every 60 seconds
Completeness95%
OwnerControl Room Operations
Ingestion: Backend alert list updated by simulated telemetry refreshes and acknowledgement mutations
Governance: Acknowledged alerts are removed from the active queue while retained in operational workflow history in a production integration.
Validated 06 May 2026, 11:30:00
Metric provenance
MTBF Trend
Needs Calibration
SourceMaintenance history + asset reliability baselines
RefreshDaily reliability batch in target state; static May 2026 baseline in prototype
Completeness84%
OwnerAsset Reliability Lead
Ingestion: Prototype trend derived from asset MTBF fields and quarter-over-quarter reliability reference values
Governance: MTBF trend should be recalibrated once validated failure labels and closed work-order history are connected during inception.
Validated 05 May 2026, 16:00:00
Top Assets at Risk: next 48h
Asset Health Trend: 30 days
How failure risk is scored
Failure-risk scores combine telemetry deviations, correlated operating context, maintenance history, and threshold rules so engineers can see why the model is escalating an asset.
Model
MCM Asset Failure Risk Ensemble
Horizon
Next 48 hours
Escalation
≥ 70%
Alert Queue
Recommended Actions
Asset Drill-Down: Conveyor C3
SubsystemBelt drive
LocationUnderground ore transfer
Recommended actionInspect bearing C3-L for lubrication loss
Bearing temperature
82°C
Vibration RMS
4.6 mm/s
MTBF
410 hours
Next service
2026-05-17
Predictive model explainability
Why the model assigned 82% failure risk
Rules and supervised-learning style features derived from simulated historian trends, alert history, maintenance intervals, MTBF movement, and operating baselines for the RFP prototype.
Confidence
88%
Threshold
70%
Bearing overheating or belt-drive misalignment
Thermal deviation
Observed 83°C vs 63°C operating baseline
34%
Temperature is compared with the asset's normal operating band and increases risk when it remains above baseline for the current duty cycle.
increases risk
Vibration RMS
Observed 5.8 mm/s vs 3.2 mm/s underground baseline
20%
Rising vibration is correlated with bearing wear, misalignment, looseness, or driveline fatigue depending on subsystem type.
increases risk
MTBF deterioration
Observed 410 hours, 44% below reference fleet trend vs Fleet peer baseline over comparable duty cycles
15%
The model compares recent reliability performance with peer assets to detect degradation that may not appear in a single sensor alone.
increases risk
Maintenance proximity
Observed 11 days to next planned service vs Planned-maintenance interval and open work-order history
5%
Risk increases when the model sees elevated sensor signals close to a service event or with unresolved work orders.
reduces risk
Correlation logic
Thermal and vibration deviations are evaluated together before an asset is escalated above the failure-risk threshold.
Risk is increased when short-term sensor anomalies match previous maintenance scenarios for the same subsystem.
Recommended actions are prioritized when model risk, alert severity, and next-service timing point to the same failure mode.
Recommended action logic
Because the risk score is above the 70% decision threshold and the dominant drivers match Belt drive failure patterns, the portal recommends: Inspect bearing C3-L for lubrication loss.
Data quality and assumptions
Data completeness86%
Last simulated poll within 60 seconds; underground network quality assumed variable.
The current prototype uses representative OT and maintenance data rather than live mine historian feeds.
Risk scores should trigger engineering review and work-order triage, not automatic equipment shutdown.
Model thresholds should be recalibrated after MCM provides validated historical failure and maintenance records.
Sensor confidence must be confirmed during inception and discovery.
Model confidence will improve after connection to MCM historian, CMMS, and validated failure labels.
Related alerts
Bearing temperature critical - Conveyor C3
Work orders
WO-2026-4567AssignedInspect bearing C3-L for lubrication loss